Final Project Report

This project has reached its end. The final research project as CHE Higher Education Monitor 14, is available at:

http://www.che.ac.za/media_and_publications/higher-education-monitor/higher-education-monitor-14-learning-teach-higher

(copy the link and paste it in the web browser)

Structure, Culture and Agency - Project Close and Final Publications

Personal note from Brenda - Project Leader

The research project: Interplay of structure, culture and agency: A study on professional development in higher education has finally come to an end, after six years of funding by the National Research Foundation. Now that it is over I can say 'thank you' to project members, it has been good, and I hope that we will meet in other research projects, or that you enjoy new ones you become involved in. 

My personal sense of the learnings from the project are:

With regard to teaching and learning:

• the importance of 'professional learning' with all the ramifications of that phrase, rather than the one with which we started the project, 'professional development'
• the interrelationship between formal learning opportunities and workplace learning, where both are necessary - and concomitant with this interrelationship, the importance of professional development staff or centres, as well as attention to the management, resourcing and culture of the workplace environment
• the importance of socio-economic and geographic factors influencing teaching and learning - and concomitant with this, the need for collaboration and sharing across disciplines and institutions

With regard to research:

• the importance of large group, cross- institutional and collaborative research - and concomitant with this, the need to pay careful attention to how the collaboration is structured so that it is supportive and leads to useful research and learning outcomes
• the value of exploring different theoretical frames, and understanding how different lenses facilitate different kinds of findings.

Publications

We close off the project with three publications:

1. The Final Project Report

This has been uploaded onto a page on this blog, where you can access a draft. A print and e-version will be published by the CHE in 2017. 

2. Book: Theorising Learning to Teach

This book is born out of a fascination with the variety of theoretical frameworks one can use to theorise learning to teach and the value that these frameworks might have for one's research and strategising how to advance learning to teach in one's institution. The book contains chapters using the data from the project by Chris Winberg (using social realism), Viv Bozalek (using socio-materialism) and Brenda Leibowitz (talking about crossing over from one theoretical framework to another). The full range of contents are:

Part 1: Sociomaterialism 1. How Sociomaterial Approaches Could Support Higher Education as a Critical Practice 2. Reflecting on Things: Sociomaterial Perspectives on Academic Development 3. Diffracting Learning/Teaching Entanglements: A South African Vice-Chancellor’s Perspective 4. Knowledge Infrastructures, Digital Higher Education and the Hidden Curriculum Part 2: Practice Theories 5. Learning to Teach as the Development of Practice 6. Developing Professionally: A Practice Based Perspective 7. Stewardship as Practice: ‘Learning on-the-Job’ for the Academic Development Newcomer 8. Cultural-Historical Approaches to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Teaching to Support Student Agency Part 3: Critical and Social Realism 9. Critical and Social Realism as Theoretical Resources for Thinking about Professional Development and Equity 10. Teaching in Higher Education as a Collective Endeavour 11. ‘Extreme Teaching’: Exercising Agency in Difficult Contexts Part 4: Crossover Perspectives 12. Researching Learning to Teach: A Narrative on ‘Crossing Over’ 13. Putting Theory to Work: Comparing Theoretical Perspectives on Academic Practices in Teaching and Learning Change 14. Post-script on Theorising Learning to Teach: Insights, Absences and Future Possibilities

3. Special Issue of the South African Journal of Higher Education, "Contextual Approaches to Academic Development" (2016, 30, 6). I have reproduced the editorial, by Brenda Leibowitz, JoAnne Vorster and Clever Ndebele here: 

South African Journal of Higher Education http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/30-6-714 Volume 30 | Number 6 | 2016 | pages 1‒7 eISSN 1753-5913 1 

EDITORIAL 

Special issue: Contextual Approaches to Academic Development 

WHY A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT? 

B. L. Leibowitz 

Faculty of Education 

University of Johannesburg 

Johannesburg, South Africa 

e-mail: brendal@uj.ac.za 

J. Vorster 

Centre for Higher Education Research, Teaching and Learning 

Rhodes University 

Grahamstown, South Africa 

e-mail: j.vorster@ru.ac.za 

C. Ndebele 

School of Teacher Education and Training 

North West University Mafikeng Campus 

Mafikeng, South Africa 

clever.ndebele@nwu.ac.za 

One of the peculiarities of the literature on academic professional development with regard to teaching is its a-political nature. It pays insufficient attention to issues of equity, and to how privilege, geographical location, class and ethnicity influence the way that staff in higher education learn to teach. This is surprising, or paradoxical, given the strong world-wide concern for widening participation and student success in higher education. The approaches towards professional academic development have been dominated by literature from the global North, which does not take into account conditions in resource-constrained environments. We contend that literature from these Southern environments enrich the international body of literature. Thus there is a need for scholarly writing on learning to teach in higher education, which takes a specifically social, contextual and relational approach and which considers these within 

2 

resource-rich as well as resource-constrained environments. 

Attention to the social and material influences on professional academic development allows for a nuanced understanding of how to strategise in order to enhance teaching and learning in varied contexts. This should enable academics, who are concerned with their own teaching and with contributing to change in their institutions, to chart appropriate strategies in the current complex and demanding era. 

In the literature on professional development there is an increasing call for educational policies to be context sensitive (Mathieson 2012; Trowler 2008; Bamber, Trowler, Saunders and Knight 2009). As an example of this concern with context, Blackmore, Chambers, Huxley and Thackwray (2010) call for ‘contextual intelligence’. The word ‘context’ is often used to denote disciplinary context (cf. Mathieson 2012) or it can denote time, as in the phrase ‘in current contexts’, or domains such as ‘in the political context’. In the literature on situated learning the word ‘context’ suggests learning occurring through practice (Lave 1996) with a strong emphasis on history and biography (Lave 2012). The word ‘context’ is taken up in the work of Archer (1995) to imply ‘environment in which the (‘macro’) features of the system are either reproduced or transformed’ (Archer 1995, 11). This can refer to any level, from macro to micro. 

Higher education institutions are contexts in which features of the sector may be either reproduced or transformed. Context can also refer to levels of the curriculum, for example the contextualised learning needs of lecturers on undergraduate programmes as opposed to those teaching on postgraduate programmes. It can refer to the professional learning of academics at different types of institutions or in different geographical locations. The concern with context can have a more overtly political overtone, for example, there is the need to consider professional academic development in post-colonial contexts or in neo-liberal times. Whatever the perspective adopted by the researcher or academic developer, the fact remains that strategies for the provision of opportunities for academics to learn to teach should take the needs of individual academics into account, as well as the challenges and opportunities generated by the settings in which they work ‒ as the articles in this special issue demonstrate. 

Many of the articles in this volume emerge from a large-scale research project funded by the National Research Foundation to explore the influence of context on professional development of academics in their teaching role. Research for this project was conducted across a range of universities across South Africa. These included historically advantaged, research-intensive universities; historically disadvantaged, rural-based universities and universities of technology. This collection includes a number of articles from that project, as well as others 

3 

that are not related to it, but that focus on how context influences professional development. 

In the first article of this collection, Naidoo critiques what she calls the evangelical adherence to dominant theories in research and writing on higher education and, in particular, in the field of professional academic development. She argues that to address social justice in higher education it is necessary to theorise in ways that are sensitive to context and that this is not possible if theories are adopted uncritically. Drawing on the work of C. Wright Mills, she suggests that it is possible for higher education researchers in South Africa to engage critically with dominant discourses, and for professional academic development to find creative solutions to local educational challenges that promote social justice and address social inequities and injustices in higher education. 

In the next section on professional development programmes, Quinn and Vorster examine aspects of academics’ and academic developers’ professional learning through formal courses. In their conceptual article, Quinn and Vorster use Luckett’s model for an epistemically diverse curriculum, Kitchener’s levels of cognition and Maton’s concepts of knowledge and knowers to analyse the curriculum for a postgraduate diploma in higher education specifically for academic developers. They argue that a course which prepares academic developers to practise in the complex terrain of contemporary higher education requires participants to engage with specific kinds of knowledge, ways of thinking and ways of being so that they can contribute towards addressing the numerous and vexing teaching and learning challenges in their institutional contexts. Their analysis makes explicit the organising principles of a curriculum for academic developers, so that the curriculum designers are able to use their insights to strengthen the design, pedagogy and assessment of their courses. In addition, making the organising principles explicit to participants enables them to be much more conscious of what, how and why they learn. 

Dison critically analyses the role of reflection in a Postgraduate Diploma in Higher Education (PGDip [HE]) at the University of the Witwatersrand. In order to develop critically reflective practice amongst the participants, the course presenters explicitly integrated reflective practice into the pedagogy and assessment of the course. The article reports on the strategies and tools for integrating reflective practice in the first module of the PGDip (HE) and shows how course participants have responded to embedded meta-level questions incorporated into the assessment tasks. The article contributes to a complex understanding of what it means to reflect meaningfully on the outcomes of a professional course of this nature. 

In the final article on professional development programmes, Shava looks at the extent to which a professional development programme, the PGDHE at a university in Zimbabwe, has 

4 

enhanced the performance of academics. The findings of this study reveal that participants wanted and needed professional development so that they could improve the quality of their own teaching and that the PGDHE enabled academics to improve their teaching strategies resulting in enhancement of the quality of teaching and learning. 

In their articles, Keane and Keane and Castle examine writing development through short courses and workshops. In the first article, Keane and Castle discuss support strategies to enable academics and postgraduate students to write more and better, and to take pleasure in writing. Drawing on published literature and their own experiences of facilitating writing development initiatives, they look critically at writing development strategies used in both their own research-intensive institution in Johannesburg, and strategies used in other institutions, mainly, but not only, in South Africa. They weigh up the benefits and drawbacks of five writing strategies: writing courses and workshops; writing groups; writing mentoring and coaching; PhD boot camps; and writing retreats. They conclude that some writing strategies can be combined or sequenced to provide the engagement and support academics need to write productively and with pleasure. Keane argues that some of the difficulties experienced by supervisors and students could be addressed through the use of coaching principles and processes. Drawing on Sternberg’s (1997) Triarchical Theory, she maintains that integrating aspects of coaching in the design of supervision workshops makes it possible to address consciously the contextual influences on professional academic development. She claims that the coaching aspects of supervisor workshops open up spaces for closer collegiality and that they model empowering, developmental conversations between colleagues. 

The next set of articles examines the contextual constraints and/or enablements for academics’ engagement in professional development for their teaching role in a range of different institutions. Jawitz and Perez assert that the dominant research discourse in research-intensive universities constrains academics’ engagement with professional development opportunities for teaching. Their article reports on a study of narratives that show how a group of academics at the University of Cape Town overcame contextual constraints to assert their agency. The academics justified their engagement in professional development for teaching through alternative pragmatic, social and reflexive approaches. Each of these approaches offers a different basis for justifying the academics’ participation in terms of the functions that the professional development opportunities fulfil. In the process, the academics exercise their agency and reduce the power of the dominant research discourse that locates teaching as secondary within the institution. 

Ndebele, Muhuru and Nkonki turn the focus to the cultural, structural and agential 

5 

conditions that enable or constrain the professional development of academics in their teaching role at two rurally-based, historically disadvantaged universities. Thematic analysis of the data revealed constraints around promotion policies and the value accorded to research development over teaching development, as well as time constraints resulting from huge workloads and the inability of rural institutions to attract and retain staff. The study recommends that the theoretical frameworks that inform professional development, as well as the practicalities of the modes of delivery of professional development interventions in rural-based universities, need to be reconsidered. 

Omingo uses Archer’s morphogenetic approach to analyse how lecturers learn to teach in private universities in Kenya. She analyses the emergent structural and cultural powers and the emotions that prompt lecturers, in different contexts, to learn how to teach. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect qualitative data from twenty-five purposively selected lecturers. The analysis indicated that the university’s policy statements, the teaching and learning conditions and student composition presented structural and cultural limitations that lecturers had to respond to. Although there were emergent structural and cultural powers that played a role, the lecturers’ experience of emotions such as worry, threat, curiosity and disappointment played a greater role in prompting their desire to teach. 

The articles by Winberg and Garraway and Cameron and Woods both use Activity Theory to examine aspects of professional development. The focus of the article by Winberg and Garraway is a teaching and learning activity system which is studied for the purpose of understanding and resolving contradictions in the system. They examined the perspectives of university teachers and senior university managers in relation to the activity system. Data was obtained from interviews with university teachers who had expressed an interest in teaching and learning and who had demonstrated considerable ability in university teaching. Interviews were also conducted with senior managers responsible for teaching and learning at the institution. Winberg and Garraway applied the tools provided by Engeström’s Activity Theory to analyse areas of contradiction and make constructive suggestions for using the identified areas of difficulty as sites for growth and development. They also propose ways for university teaching to be supported by university managers in contexts of change and challenge. 

Cameron and Woods argue that in institutions of higher education there are clear stages that teachers go through as they gain teaching experience. They analyse and interpret data collected from academic development practitioners during a workshop of the HELTASA (Higher Education Learning and Teaching Association of Southern Africa) Professional Development Special Interest Group, using Activity Theory as their lens. They propose a 

6 

‘Ladder of Learning’, a hierarchically structured framework to inform appropriate professional development activities focused on teaching and aimed at academics as they progress in their careers from emerging to distinguished practice. Insights gained from the findings and recommendations could be used to strengthen academic professional development practice in higher education institutions in South Africa. 

Leibowitz explores the relationship between intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and contextual social and material conditions influencing the desire of academics to learn to teach at three very different South African universities. The article considers these three influences from the perspective of self-determination theory, and shows that the theory is relevant for a discussion on motivation to learn to teach. Leibowitz shows how a careful analysis of these forms of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in combination with contextual influences has implications for national and institutional policy on professional academic development. Her study suggests that intrinsic forms of motivation might play an important role in encouraging academics to participate in professional development opportunities, but they are rendered less effective by sub-optimal social and material conditions and thus by issues of social injustice and inequality. 

The final article in the special issue, by Van Schalkwyk and McMillan, uses duoethnography and the notion of border-crossing to examine how two academic development professionals navigate their insider-outsider positions. The practice of situating academic development practitioners within faculties poses challenges for practitioners from outside the disciplinary space. Literature highlights how discourse and culture create tensions amongst role-players in cross-disciplinary contexts. The article examines the experiences of two practitioners as insider-outsiders in the health sciences. Duoethnography is a collaborative methodology where researchers, in dialogue, critique the meanings they give to social and epistemological constructs. Drawing on the concept of ‘border crossing’, the study signals how the insider-outsider location of academic development practitioners might be mediated to support quality teaching. 

It is hoped that the multiple contexts examined and the theoretical perspectives employed in this collection of articles contribute to understanding the potential effects of various social, material, cultural and agential conditions on academics’ engagement with opportunities for professional learning, and that the articles offer insights to academic developers on how context shapes the possibilities for academics’ participation in professional development. 

REFERENCES 

Archer, M. 1995. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge 

7 

University Press. 

Bamber, V., P. Trowler, M. Saunders and P. Knight. 2009. Introduction: Continuities, enhancement and higher education. In Enhancing learning, teaching, assessment and curriculum in higher education, ed. V. Bamber, P. Trowler and M. Saunders, 1‒6. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw Hill. 

Blackmore, P., J. Chambers, L. Huxley and B. Thackwray. 2010. Tribalism and territoriality in the staff and educational development world. Journal of Further and Higher Education 34(1): 105–117 

Lave, J. 1996. Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3(3): 149–164. 

Lave, J. 2012. Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 19(2): 156‒171. 

Mathieson, S. 2012. Disciplinary cultures of teaching and learning as socially situated practice: rethinking the space between social constructivism and epistemological essentialism from the South African Experience. Higher Education 63: 549‒564. 

Trowler, P. 2008. Cultures and change in higher education: Theories and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Educational development through the discipline collective: A study of academic workgroups

Coming to the International Consortium for Educational Development (ICED) in Cape Town in November 2016 are presentations and discussions from an international research project  

“The flow of new knowledge practices: An inquiry into teaching, learning and curriculum dynamics in academic workgroups”. This study departs from the tradition in education research that favours an individualised and cognitive focus on professional development, and brings attention to the disciplinary collective as the site for researching change. The study aims to bring fresh theoretical perspectives to this field through social, cultural and material approaches to teaching and learning change, extending educational development and its capacity for ethical action to the institutional arrangements and agencies of the university meso-level.   

See our blog on the project at https://workgroupgcertstudy.wordpress.com/blog/

Final project meeting of the Structure, Culture and Agency Group

Thirteen members from the Structure, Culture and Agency research group came together for the final project face to face meeting, at Montfleur, Stellenbosch, from 30 May - 1 June 2016.This is not our last activity together, but rather, the last 'face to face' meeting. For me as the project leader, this is a little bit of a sad moment, as I feel quite close to people in the project, which is now in its sixth year!

The continuing activity that we are engaging in as a group, is a research report for the Council for Higher Education (CHE), on Professional Learning in Higher Education in South Africa. We shared our draft report sections with Denyse Webbstock from the CHE yesterday, which was a great experience. It is not often one has the opportunity to engage with someone from the official organizations that one would like, to read the final recommendations. It was an additional privilege in that Denyse used to be involved in academic development, and understands the issues we have been researching. Our project culminates with several exciting publications: three chapters in a book, Theorising Learning to Teach (Routledge/SRHE, due out in November 2016, eds B. Leibowitz, V. Bozalek and P. Kahn) and five chapters in a special issue of the South African Journal of Higher Education (SAJHE), ends B. Leibowitz, C. Ndebele and J. Vorster, due out in late 2016. 

New article out in IJAD - Jawitz and Perez

A new article from the Structure, Culture and Agency team is out. By Jeff Jawitz and Teresa Perez from the University of Cape Town, it presents data from a UCT case study on the attitudes of academics towards professional development with regard to the teaching role. The article is extremely valuable, firstly in its treatment of the concept of agency in institutional settings, and secondly  in the manner in which it depicts attitudes towards teaching in a climate where research is still privileged in relation to incentives, performance criteria and individual attitudes. The study is based on one institution, but the trend is representative of other data collected in the broader NRF funded study, and trends evident nationally and internationally.  Pleasingly, it suggests that the tide might be changing somewhat, as there is slightly more valuing of professional development with regard to the teaching role in this institution than previously. Whether this trend is due to the tireless efforts of those in academic development who advocate for the status of teaching, or whether it is simply the outcome of a younger generation of academics whose views on teaching and research are different to those held previously, or the result of an acknowledgement by senior managers that the incentivizing of research over teaching is having deleterious consequences - especially in a country where matriculation rates and participation in high education is inadequate - is not clear. Based on my experience at the two South African universities where I have been working in the past few years, and my engagement in national forums, I think it might be a combined outcome of all of these trends. 

Here is the detail about the article: 


International Journal for Academic Development, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1081852


Investing in teaching development: navigating risk in a research intensive institution

It is often assumed that academics working in a research intensive university are unlikely to invest in the professional development of their teaching. Institutional structures and culture tend to undermine investment in academics’ teaching role. This study, conducted at the University of Cape Town, draws on an analysis of the environment within which academics make decisions to invest in their role as teachers. While acknowledging the privileging of research embedded in the institution, a significant group of academics have found ways to assert their academic identities as teachers despite the possible consequences and risks that this position entails.